Saturday
February 15, 2003
Alan
wrote:
Are the protesters blindly leading us into
a future of unimaginable horrors?
I
replied:
Are
you sure they are blind? Many seem to believe that the destruction of our earth-raping,
sexist, superficial, materialistic, racist, oppressive civilization would be a
step forward...
I
am amazed every day at the ability of highly educated people to express
strongly held opinions without any basis in fact or principle...or thought for
the consequences. It isn't that I disagree with the logic of their positions...it's
that the only logic that matters to them is the logic of partisanship...there
is no room for reason and no interest in empiricism. Arguments are dismissed rather
than refuted.
When
the survival of our civilization is hostage to the politics of personal vilification...we
are in big trouble. I think that the existence of liberal democracy in this
world is worth fighting for. Many are hostile to that view.
Scary.
When
people talk about the fall of Rome and blame it on decadence, they talk about
orgies and stuff....but it is really the belief that civilization was not worth
defending that done 'em in.
Our
own nihilism and narcissism are more dangerous than the bad guys are.
As
events evolve, the pressures within our society will grow until we either surrender
or get serious. I can't predict which way we'll go when we reach the crisis.
I do worry about it.
Ultimately,
this is a contest of will. The information/education/propaganda dimension is the
main theater of operations. We have not been doing well there.
In
fact, our side in this war represents a wealthy, powerful minority of the world's
population. Our interests are (in this sense) antidemocratic. It is natural that
the majority of the people worldwide see us as imposing our values on them.
Our
own education and media systems have indoctrinated several generations of Americans
with guilt and confusion. So, it is hard to blame kids for not knowing how to
think.
But,
the greatest responsibility and the greatest failure belong to us. We have failed
to present plausible arguments that demonstrate the worthiness of our goals. We
have not convinced people that this war centers around the question of our own
survival. We have not explained that it is not about avenging ourselves on bin
Laden for the WTC attacks. We have not explained that the utter destruction of
al Qaeda will not complete our task.
We
cannot fight an enemy who we can't name. Our own "tolerance" prevents us from
formulating objectives. If we can't name our enemy, we can't explain why Iraq
has to go down. So people are free to think it is about oil, or about Bush's issues
with his father...or whatever. If we are shocked into abandoning our self-indulgent
attitudes we will rise, fight and win...later, we'll atone for the genocide. But
if we cling to our "values" we will die and our descendants will wear burkhas.
So...everybody
is preaching to the choir or trying to score debating points. We need to be leading
people to better understanding. Alas, there is little interest in that thankless
task.
Because
of my weblog,
I have many interactions with people who want to discuss these issues. Almost
always, they insist on ritual statements like "the inspections are working...so
we should continue that instead of letting oleaginous Cowboy W bomb the hell out
of the innocent Iraqis". Any effort to look at the purpose of the inspections
or the effectiveness of past anti-proliferation efforts spirals into cant and
denial...and Democratic Party €uropean progressive talking
points.
It
will take a bigger shock than September 11 to break out of that viewpoint. Like
I said, when that happens, it could go either way.
Sorry to ramble like this....but I am very tired now.
Later,
A